THE “EFFET UTILE” IN CJEU JURISPRUDENCE

Autores/as

  • Dimitris Liakopoulos Tufts University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.2359-0106.2020.v7n1.p98-132

Resumen

A Equipe Editorial da Revista Vertentes do Direito (RVD) procede à retratação da pesquisa em razão de (i) não atender a política editorial da revista no que se refere ao ineditismo e originalidade, (ii) o artigo ter sido  publicado  em outra Revista cient´ífica Internacional e (iii) ter sido informada que o autor  jamais compôs o quadro de docentes da Tufts University.

Biografía del autor/a

Dimitris Liakopoulos, Tufts University

Full Professor of European Union Law at the Fletcher School-Tufts University (MA in international law and MA of Arts in Law and diplomacy). Full Professor of International and European Criminal and Procedural Law at the De Haagse Hogenschool-The Hague. Professor of International law at Massachusetts School of Law. Attorney at Law a New York and Bruxelles

Citas

ACCETTO, M., ZLEPTNIG, S., The principle of effectiveness. Rethinking its role in community law, in European Public Law, 11, 2005, pp. 382ss.

ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, D., Do Francovich and the principle of proportionality weaken Simmenthal (II) and confirm abuse of rights?, in Common Market Law Review, 38, 2001, pp. 772-774.

ANDERSEN, S., The enforcement of EU law: the role of the European Commission, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.

BACON, K., BACON QL, K., European Union law of state aid, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, pp. 213ss.

BARNARD, C., The substantive law of the European Union. The four freedoms, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016.

BECK, G., The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the EU, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012, pp. 196ss.

BECK, G., The legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice of the EU, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland, 2012.

BENGOETXEA, J., MACCORMICK, N., MORAL SORIANO, L., Integration and integrity in the legal reasoning of the European court of justice, in G. DE BÚRCA, J.H.H.

WEILER, The European Court of justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001, pp. 65ss.

BENGOETXEA, J., The legal reasoning of the European court of justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993, pp. 235ss.

BERRY, E., HOMEWOOD, M.J., BOGUSZ, B., Complete EU law: Text, cases and materials, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015.

BRADLEY K., and others (eds.) Of courts and constitutions. Liber amicorum in honour of Nial Fennelley, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland, 2014, pp. 30ss.

BROBERG, M., FENGER, N., Preliminary references to the European Court of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014, pp. 402ss.

CHALMERS, D., DAVIES, G., MONTI, G., European Union law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014

CHEVALLEIR, R.M., Methods and reasoning of the European court in its interpretation of community law, in Common Market Law Review, 2, 1965, pp. 25ss.

CONANT, L.C., Justice contained: Law and politics in the European Union, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2018.

CONWAY, G., European Union law, ed. Routledge, London & New York, 2015.

CRAIG, P., DE BÚRCA, G., The evolution of EU law, Oxford University Press, Oxford,

CRAIG, P., EU administrative law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.

DA CRUZ DE VILAÇA, J.L., Le principe reproduites aux articles 31 à 33 des Conventions de Vienne. Approche objectiviste ou approche volontariste de l'interprètation?, in Revue Generale de Droit international Public, 115, 2011, pp. 352ss.

DA CRUZ VILAÇA, J.L., European Union law and integration. Twenty years of judicial application of European Union law, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland, 2014.

DA CRUZ VILAÇA, J.L., Le principe de l'effet utile du droit de l'Union dans la jurisprudence de la Cour, in A. ROSAS, E. LEVITS, Y. BOT,. The Court of Justice and the construction of Europe. Analyses and perspectives on sixty years of case-law, Springer, The Hague, 2013, pp. 280ss.

DE CARVALHO MOITINHO DE ALMEIDA, J.C., L'interpretation par la Cour de justice de l'Union du droit europèen de procèdure civile, in K. BRADLEY et al. (eds.) Of courts and constitutions. Liber amicorum in honour of Nial Fennelley, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland, 2014, pp. 30ss

DE VISSCHER, C., L'interprètation judiciaire des traitès d'organisation internationale, in Rivista di Diritto Internazionale, 1958, pp. 18ss

DEGAN, V., L'interprètation des accord en droit international, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1963.

DUMON, D., La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice. Examen critique des mèthodes d'interprètation, in Rencontre judiciaire et universitaire, 27-28 septembre 1986, Luxembourg, 1986, pp. 4ss.

EVERLING, U., On the judge-made law o the European community's courts, in D. O'KEEFFE (ed.), Judicial review in European Union law. Liber amicorum in honour of Lord Slynn of Hadley, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2000, pp. 33ss.

EVERLING, U., Reflections on the reasoning in the judgments of the Court of justice of European communities, in K. THORUP, J. ROSENLOV, Festkrift til Ole Due, København, Gec Gads Forlag, Copenhagen, 1994, pp. 494ss

FENNELLY, N., Legal interpretation at the European Court of Justice, in Fordham International Law Journal, 21, 1997, pp. 658ss

FINTON, E., Strengthening the effectiveness of community law. Direct effect, article 5 EC and the European Court of Justice, in New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 1999, pp. 308ss.

FOLSOM, T.H., Principles of European Union law, including Brexit, West Academic, Minnesota, 2017, pp. 278ss.

FOSTER, N., Foster on EU law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017.

GARBEN, S., GOVAERE, I., The division of competences between the EU and the member states, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland, 2017.

GERARDIN, D., LAYNE-FARRAR, A., PETIT, N., EU competition law and economics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.

GUILD, E., PEERS, S., TOMKIN, J., The EU citizenship directive. A commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.

HARTKAMP, A., SIBURGH, C., DEVROE, W., Cases, materials and text on European Union law and private law, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland, 2017, pp. 282ss.

HATJE, A., TERHECHTE, J.P., MÜLLER-GRAFF, P.C., Europarechtswissenschaft, ed. Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2018.

JACOB, M., Precedent and case-based reasoning in the European Court of Justice: Unfinished business, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014.

KLAMMERT, M., The principle of loyalty in EU law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.

KUTSCHER, H., Mèthodes d'interprètation vues par un juge à la Cour, in Rencontre judiciaire et universitaire, 27-28 septembre 1976, Luxembourg, 1976, pp. 3ss.

LASSER, M., Judicial deliberations. A comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004, pp. 212ss.

LECOURT, R., L'Europe des juges, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 1976, pp. 238ss

LENAERTS, K., GUTIÉRREZ-FONS, J.A., To say what the law of the EU is: Methods of interpretation and the European Court of Justice, EUI working paper, 2013/9, pp. 28

LENAERTS, K., MASELIS, I., GUTMAN, K., European Union procedural law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014, pp. 133ss.

MANGAS MARTÍN, A., Tratado de la Uniòn Europea, Tratado de Funcionamiento, ed. Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2018.

MAZÁK, J., MOSER, M.K., Adjudication by reference to general principles of EU law: A second look at the Mangold case law, in M. ADAMS et al. (eds.), Judging Europe's judges, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013, pp. 62ss.

NICOLA, F., DAVIES, B., European Union law stories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017.

NICOLAIDES, P., GEILMANN, M., What is effective implementation of EU law?, in Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 19, 2012, pp. 40ss.

NORMAN, L., The mechanism of institutional conflict in the EU, Routledge, New York, London, 2016.

O'NEILL, A., Decisions of the ECJ and their constitutional implications, Butterworts, London, 1994.

ORMAND, R., L'utilisation particulière de la mèthode d'interprètation des traitès selon leur "effet utile" par la Cour de Justice des communautès europèennes, in Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Europèen, 14, 1976, pp. 625ss

PEERS, S., EU justice and home affairs law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.

PESCATORE, P., Les objectifs de la Communautè europèenne comme principles l'interpètation dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice, in W.J. Ganschof van der Mersch, Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp. 328ss.

PESCATORE, P., Monisme, dualisme et "effet utile" dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de la communautè europèenne, in A.A.V.V., Une communautè de droit. Festscrhfit für Gil Carlos Rodriguez Iglesias, BWN Berliner Wissenschaft, Berlin, 2003, pp. 332ss.

POIARES MADURO, M., Interpreting European law: Judicial adjudication in the content of constitutional pluralism, in European Journal of Legal Studies, 1, 2007.

PRECHAL, S., WIDDERSHOVEN, R., Redefining the relationship between "Rewe-effectiveness" and effective judicial protection, in Review of European Administrative Law, 2011, pp. 32s.

RASMUSSEN, H., On law and policy in the European Court of Justice, ed. Springer, Dordrecht, 1986, pp. 178ss

ROTT, P., The court of justice's principle of effectiveness and its unforesseable impact on private law relationships, in D. LECZYKIEWICZ, S. WEATHERILL (eds), The involvement of EU law in private law relationships, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013, pp. 182ss.

SACK, D., Europeanization through law compliance and party differences. The ECJ's Rüffert judgment C-346/06 and amendments to public procurement laws in German Federal State, in Journal of European Integration, 34 (3), 2012, pp. 244ss.

SADL, U., The role of effet utile in preserving the continuity and authority of European Union law: Evidence form the citation web of the pre accession case law of the Cout of Justice of the EU, in European Journal of Legal Studies, 8, 2015, pp. 18ss.

SCHERMERS, H.G., WAELBROECK, D.F., Judicial protection in the European Union, Wolters Kluwer, The Hague, 2001, pp. 22ss.

SCHOCKWEILER, F., La Cour de justice des communautès europèennes dèpasse-t-elle les limites de ses attributions?, in Journal des Tribunaux. Droit Europèen, 1995, pp. 76ss.

SCHÜTZE, R., TRIDIMAS, T., Oxford principles of European Union law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.

SCHWARZE, J., BECKER, V., HATJE, A., SCHOO, J., EU-Kommentar, ed. Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2019.

SNYDER, F., The effectiveness of European community law. Institutions, processes, tools and tecniques, in Modern Law Review, 56, 1993, pp. 26ss.

SOREL, J.M., BORÉ EVENO, V., 1969 Vienna convention. Article 31. General rule of interpretation, in O. CORTEIN, P. KLEIN, The Vienna convention on the law of treaties. A commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011, pp. 804ss

STRAND, S., The pressing on problem in damages and restitution under EU law, Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, 2017.

TEMPLE LANG, J., Basic princples of European law applying to national courts, in Svensk Juristidning, 2011, pp. 136ss.

TRIDIMAS, T., The Court of justice and judicial activism, in European Law Review, 2, 1996, pp. 206ss.

USHERWOOD, J., PINDER, S., The European Union. A very short introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.

WEATHERILL, S., Activism and restraint in the European court of justice, in P. CAPPS et al. (eds.), Asserting jurisdiction. International and European legal perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, pp. 268ss.

WEATHERILL, S., Law and values in the EU, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016.

WOODS, L., WATSON, P., Steiner & Woods European Union law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, pp. 37ss

Publicado

2020-06-12

Cómo citar

Liakopoulos, D. (2020). THE “EFFET UTILE” IN CJEU JURISPRUDENCE. Vertentes Do Direito, 7(1), 98–132. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.2359-0106.2020.v7n1.p98-132

Número

Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2020): Revista Vertentes do Direito

Sección

Artigo Científico

Licencia

Os trabalhos aprovados para publicação tornar-se-ão propriedade da Revista  sem qualquer ônus para a mesma. A Equipe Editorial se reserva o direito de promover as adequações necessárias para publicação.

 O conteúdo dos trabalhos publicados na Revista Jurídica eletrônica Vertentes do Direito - inclusive quanto à sua veracidade, exatidão e atualização das informações e métodos de pesquisa - é de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores. As opiniões e conclusões expressas não representam posições da Revista nem da Universidade Federal do Tocantins.