ADEQUACY IN A STRATEGIC PLANNING STUDY

SCRUTINIZING THE USE OF AN ADDITIONAL SPEECH DIMENSION

Autores/as

Resumen

This article presents the results of a study that aimed at scrutinizing adequacy adopted  as a speech dimension and measure in Specht and D’Ely (2020)’s study. Adequacy is a dimension and a measure little explored in studies that analyze speech performance from a cognitive perspective. In the case of Specht and D’Ely, they decided to include it to tackle more discourse-oriented features of speech performance. The composition of the measure was the sum of raters’ scores to five criteria: structure, appeal, clarity, lexical choice and fluency. However, it was not analyzed whether all criteria had an impact on participants’ speech performances individually. For that, statistical analyses were run (a) to examine whether adequacy may be considered a separate speech dimension different from other speech dimensions used in the study, complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) and (b) to understand whether all criteria had an active role in the measure and if not which one(s) did. The results have shown that adequacy may be considered a specific speech dimension, and that every criteria, except for fluency, had an active role in the measure, being textual organization (structure) a more salient criterion. 

Citas

DE JONG, N.J.; STEINEL, M.P.; FLORIJN, A.; SCHOONEN, R. and HULSTIJN, J.H. The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. In: HOUSEN, A.; KUIKEN, F. AND VEDDER, I. (Eds), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Investigating Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012.

FIELD, A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd edition. London: Sage Publications, 2009.

FOSTER, P. Task-based learning research: expecting too much or too little? International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 19, N. 3, p. 247-263, 2009.

FOSTER, P. AND SKEHAN, P. The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 3, p. 215-247, 1999.

GUARÁ -TAVARES, M. G. Pre-task Planning, Working Memory Capacity and L2 Speech Performance. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil, 2008.

HOUSEN, A. AND KUIKEN, F. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 30, N. 4, p. 461-473, 2009.

IWASHITA, N.; BROWN, A.; MCNAMARA, T. AND O’HAGAN, S. Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics. Vol. 29, N. 1, p. 24–49, 2008.

KAISER, H.F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. Vol. 39, p. 31-36, 1974.

KUIKEN, F.; VEDDER, I. AND GILABERT, R. Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. In: Bartning, I. Martin, M. and Vedder, I. (Eds), Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and Language Testing Research. Eurosla Monographs 1. Roma: Eurosla, 2010.

LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, Special Edition, p. 579-589, 2009.

NORRIS, J. M. AND L. ORTEGA. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, Vol. 30, p. 555-578, 2009;

PALLOTTI, G. CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, Vol. 30, N. 4, p. 590-601, 2009.

RÉVÉSZ A.; EKIERT M. and TORGERSEN E. N. The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 37, p. 828–848, 2016.

SKEHAN, P. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

SKEHAN, P. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 30, N. 4, p. 510–532, 2009.

SKEHAN, P. The context for researching a processing perspective on task performance. In: SKEHAN, P. (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014.

SPECHT, A. L. Is strategic planning enough? Investigating the impact of two types of strategy instruction on students' oral planned performance. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil, 2017.

SPECHT, A. L. AND D’ELY, R. C. S. F. Tasks and Proficiency Tests: Piloting instruments of a study on strategic planning. Revista de Letras. Vol. 21, p. 170-184, 2019.

SPECHT, A. L. and D’ELY, R. C. S. F. Enhancing Strategic Planning through Strategy Instruction: The Effect of Two Types of Strategy Instruction on Learners' Oral Planned Performance. Ilha do Desterro. Vol. 73, N. 1,  p. 43-62, 2020.

Publicado

2022-09-22

Cómo citar

Specht, A. L. (2022). ADEQUACY IN A STRATEGIC PLANNING STUDY: SCRUTINIZING THE USE OF AN ADDITIONAL SPEECH DIMENSION. Porto Das Letras, 8(2), s22004. Recuperado a partir de https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/portodasletras/article/view/12848

Número

Sección

SEÇÃO LIVRE