This is an outdated version published on 2023-04-06. Read the most recent version.

Physical Space and other kinds of space

Mach, Carnap and Reichenbach classifications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20873/rpv8n1-65

Abstract

This work presents a synthesis of the comparative study of the classifications of Ernst Mach, Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach, with a main objective: the demarcation of the general problem – “what is space?” – in order to better delimit the specific problem: “what is physical space?” For this purpose, it is necessary to contrast this concept with the other “kinds of space” that designate the different meanings that the word ‘space’ can assume; meanings restricted to the intersection of the areas of physics, mathematics and philosophy.

Mach classified “space” into three kinds by considering three different approaches: physiological space (visual, tactile), geometric spaces (Euclidean, non-Euclideans) and metric space (in the sense of “space of physical metric experiences”). Carnap, in his doctoral thesis “Der Raum”, defended a different ternary classification, in which there is no unifying “space”, there are three kinds that must be rigorously distinguished, although they preserve relationships: formal space, intuitive space and physical space.

Finally, Reichenbach, in his magnum opus “The Philosophy of Space & Time”, attacked all attempts at ternary classifications and reduced them to the dual distinction between physical space and mathematical spaces. Why is this radical distinction “so current”? Did it surpass the others?

References

BIPM. Le Système international d’unités / The International System of Units (SI). 9e édition. Paris: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, 2019.

BUNGE, Mario. Física e Filosofia (trad. G. K. Guinsburg). São Paulo: Ed. Perspectiva, 2000.

_____ La Investigación Científica. Su estrategia y su filosofía (trad. Manuel Sacristán), Buenos Aires: Siglo

XXI Editores (3ª Ed.), 2004 [1967].

ČAPEK, Milič. The New Aspects of Time. Its Continuity and Novelties. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers,

CARNAP, R. Logical Syntax of Language. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 1937.

_____ Space: A Contribution to the Theory of Science. In: CARUS, A.W. et al. (eds.). The Collected Works of

Rudolf Carnap, Vol. I: Early Writings. N.Y.: Oxford U. Press, 2019.

CROCA, J. R. Eurhythmic Physics or Hyperphysics, the Unification of Physics. Saarbrücken: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, 2015.

PERSPECTIVAS | VOL. 8, Nº 1, 2023, P. 197-245

Título

DOI: 10.20873/rpv8n1-65

_____ Beyond Space and Chronological Time. The Physics of Becoming. Chisinau: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2021.

DiSALLE, Robert. Understanding Space-time. The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein. Cambridge: at University Press, 2006.

EARMAN, John. World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute vs Relational Theories of Space and Time. Cambridge,

Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press, 1989.

EARMAN, John et al. (eds.). Philosofical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds. Essays on the Philosophy

of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh: at University Press, 1993.

FRIEDMAN, M. Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Princeton: at University Press, 1983.

GRÜNBAUM, A. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2nd Ed. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company,

HOFFMANN, Dieter. The Society for Empirical/Scientific Philosophy. In: Richardson & Uebel (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. (p.41-57), 2008.

HUSSERL, E. Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy (trans. F. Kersten). The Hague (Netherlands): Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1983.

JAMMER, M. Conceitos de Espaço: A História das Teorias do Espaço na Física (trad. Vera Ribeiro). Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto & Ed. PUC-Rio, 2010.

JI, L. & PAPADOPOULOS, A. Sophus Lie and Felix Klein: The Erlangen Program and Its Impact in Mathematics

and Physics. Zürich: European Mathematical Society, 2015.

KANT, I. Crítica da Razão Pura (trad. A. Morujão). 8ª Ed. Lisboa: F. Cal. Gulbenkian, 2013.

LORENTZ, H. A., EINSTEIN, A. e MINKOWSKI, H. Textos Fundamentais da Física Moderna, Vol.I – O Princípio

da Relatividade (trad. M. J. Saraiva). 6ª Ed., Lisboa: F. Calouste Gulbenkian, 2014 [1958].

MACH, E. The Science of Mechanics. A critical and historical account of its development (trans. T. McCormack).

th Edition. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co., 1919.

_____ Space and Geometry in the Light of Physiological, Psychological and Physical Inquiry (trans. T. McCormack). La Salle, Illinois: The Open Court Publishing Co., 1943.

_____ The Analysis of Sensations (trans. C. Williams). New York: Dover, 1959.

MAUDLIN, T. Philosophy of Physics. Space and Time. Princeton: at University Press, 2012.

OBERDAN, T. The Synthesis of Logicism and Formalism in Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language. In: F. Stadler

(ed.), Scientific Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer (pp.157-168), 1993.

PAZ, M. & DiSALLE, R. (eds.). Poincaré, Philosopher of Science. Problems and Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer,

POINCARÉ, Henri. Science and Method (trans. F. Maitland). London: Thomas N&S, 2003.

REICHENBACH, H. The Philosophy of Space & Time. New York: Dover, 1958 [1927].

_____ Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California

Press, 1944.

_____ The Theory of Probability. An Inquiry into the Logical and Mathematical Foundations of the Calculus of

Probability. 2nd Ed., Berkeley-L.A.: Univ. of California Press, 1949 [1935].

PERSPECTIVAS | VOL. 8, Nº 1, 2023, P. 197-245

Título

DOI: 10.20873/rpv8n1-65

_____ Experience and Prediction. An analisys of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowlodge. Chicago:

Phoenix Books, University of Chicago Press, 1961 [1938].

_____ The Theory of Relativity and a priori Knowledge. Berkeley, L. A.: University of California Press, 1965

.

_____ The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. L. Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1968 [1951].

_____ Axiomatization of the Theory of Relativity. Berkeley and Los Angelis: University of California Press,

[1924].

_____ The Direction of Time. Berkeley and Los Angelis: California Library Print Series Edition, University of

California Press, 1971 [1956].

_____ Hans Reichenbach: Selected Writings 1909-1953. Vol. I and Vol. II (ed. by Maria Reichenbach & R. S.

Cohen). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub. Co., 1978.

_____ Defending Einstein: Hans Reichenbach’s Writings on Space, Time and Motion (ed. by S. Gimbel & A

Walz). New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006.

SCHUTZ, Bernard. A First Course in General Relativity. 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press,

SKLAR, L. Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley and L.A.: Univ. California Press, 1974.

_____ A Filosofia da Física (trad. Pedro Galvão, Paula Mateus e Desidério Murcho). Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2021.

SMOLIN, Lee. Three Roads to Quantum Gravity. New York: Basic Books, 2001.

_____ (et. al) The Principle of Relativy Locality. In ArXiv: 1101.0931v2 [31 Jan 2011]

_____ Einstein’s Unfinished Revolution. The Search for What Lies Beyond the Quantum. New York: Penguin

Press, 2019.

UNGER, R. & SMOLIN, Lee. The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time. A Proposal in Natural Philosophy.

Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. The Scientific Image. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.

_____ Quantum Mechanics: an Empirist View. N.Y.: Oxford U. Press, 1991.

_____ An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space. Nousoul Digital Pub., 2015.

Published

2023-04-05 — Updated on 2023-04-06

Versions

How to Cite

Pamplona , F. (2023). Physical Space and other kinds of space: Mach, Carnap and Reichenbach classifications. Perspectivas, 8(1), 197–245. https://doi.org/10.20873/rpv8n1-65 (Original work published April 5, 2023)

Issue

Section

Dossiê Filosofia da Física