ANÁLISE BIBLIOMÉTRICA DE REVISÕES SISTEMÁTICAS E META-ANÁLISES SOBRE COMPORTAMENTO SEGURO NO TRABALHO (2006-2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20873/2526-1487e023030Palavras-chave:
Comportamento seguro no trabalho, Clima de segurança, Bibliometria, Revisão, MetanálisesResumo
O estudo do comportamento seguro engloba uma ampla variedade de fatores e contextos. Nas últimas décadas tem havido um importante aumento na quantidade de publicações nesse âmbito, entretanto, poucas contribuições têm se dedicado a realizar análises sobre os avanços científicos neste campo. O objetivo deste estudo foi promover uma análise bibliométrica de revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises sobre o comportamento seguro no trabalho. Foi utilizado o protocolo PRISMA-ScR para sistematizar documentos disponibilizados na base de dados Scopus-Elsevier (setembro de 2023). Os resultados mostraram 12 artigos de meta-análises e 51 revisões publicadas no período de 2006 e 2023. O estudo identificou tendências e colaborações internacionais no campo do comportamento seguro no trabalho. Pesquisadores do Reino Unido, China, Israel, Austrália e EUA se destacaram nas revisões. A visualização das redes de citações permitiu compreender as relações entre comportamento seguro, clima de segurança, liderança e fatores pessoais e situacionais, em diferentes setores, com destaque nos setores da construção e da saúde. Por fim, este estudo buscou contribuir para identificar evidências e direcionar futuras pesquisas no campo do comportamento seguro no trabalho, fornecendo informações teóricas e tendências emergentes do corpo de literatura do período analisado.
Referências
Alkhutari, A. S., Al-Moraissi, E. A., Galvão, E. L., Christidis, N., & Falci, S. G. M. (2021). Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 26(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-00981-9
Aburumman, M., Newnam, S., & Fildes, B. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of workplace interventions in improving safety culture: A systematic review. Safety Science, 115, 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.027
Alper, S. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2009). A systematic review of safety violations in industry. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(4), 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.013
Alruqi, W. M., Hallowell, M. R., & Techera, U. (2018). Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Safety Science, 109, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.019
Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science apping analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (Eds.). (2021). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/jbimes-20-01
Barros-Delben, P., & Cruz, R. M. (2023). Modelo de Comportamento Seguro para Gestão de Riscos em Contextos de Isolamento, Confinamento e Extremos. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, 23(1), 2357-2364. https://doi.org/10.5935/rpot/2023.1.23295
Barros-Delben, P., Cruz, R. M., Cardoso, G. M., Ariño, D. O., Pereira, G. K., & Lopez, M. (2020). Gerenciamento do comportamento seguro para manutenção da vida na Estação Antártica Brasileira. 20(1), 883–890. https://doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2020.1.16926
Beus, J. M., Dhanani, L. Y., & McCord, M. A. (2015). A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: Addressing unanswered questions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037916
Beus, J. M., Payne, S. C., Bergman, M. E., & Arthur, W. (2010). Safety climate and injuries: An examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019164
Bischoff, L. L., Otto, A.-K., Hold, C., & Wollesen, B. (2019). The effect of physical activity interventions on occupational stress for health personnel: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 97, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.06.002
Breslin, F. C., Day, D., Tompa, E., Irvin, E., Bhattacharyya, S., Clarke, J., & Wang, A. (2007). Non-agricultural Work Injuries Among Youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.007
Burke, M. J., Salvador, R. O., Smith-Crowe, K., Chan-Serafin, S., Smith, A., & Sonesh, S. (2011). The dread factor: How hazards and safety training influence learning and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 46-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021838
Burke, M. J., Sarpy, S. A., Tesluk, P. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2002). General Safety Performance: A Test Of A Grounded Theoretical Model. Personnel Psychology, 55(2), 429–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00116.x
Chow, J., Yu-Chieh Ho, Chien, T. & Chou, W. (2023). A leading author of meta-analysis does not have a dominant contribution to research based on the CJAL score: Bibliometric analysis. Medicine, 102(15), e33519–e33519. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000033519
Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103-1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172
Clarke, S. (2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315
Clarke, S. (2010). An integrative model of safety climate: Linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 553-578. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X452122
Cornelissen, P. A., Van Hoof, J. J., & De Jong, M. D. T. (2017). Determinants of safety outcomes and performance: A systematic literature review of research in four high-risk industries. Journal of Safety Research, 62, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.009
Dedobbeleer, N., & Béland, F. (1991/2013). A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.07.004
Derdowski, L. A., & Mathisen, G. E. (2023). Psychosocial factors and safety in high-risk industries: A systematic literature review. Safety Science, 157 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105948
Dmytriw, A. A., Hui, N., Singh, T., Nguyen, D., Omid-Fard, N., Phan, K., & Kapadia, A. (2021). Bibliometric evaluation of systematic review and meta analyses published in the top 5 “high-impact” Radiology Journals. Clinical Imaging, 71, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.008
Dodoo, J.E., Al-Samarraie, H. (2019). Factors leading to unsafe behavior in the twenty first century workplace: a review. Management Review Quarterly, 69, 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00157-6
Durga, V., & Vyshnavi Mulakala. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Systematic Reviews, Meta-analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials in South Asian Orthodontic Journals from 2015 to 2022. World Journal of Dentistry, 14(3), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2200
El Dib, R. P., & Mathew, J. L. (2009). Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD005234. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub3
Gershon, R. R. M., Stone, P. W., Zeltser, M., Faucett, J., Macdavitt, K., & Chou, S.-S. (2007). Organizational Climate and Nurse Health Outcomes in the United States: A Systematic Review. Industrial Health, 45(5), 622–636. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.45.622
Griffin, M. A., & Curcuruto, M. (2016). Safety climate in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414
Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
Gordon, M. (2016). Are we talking the same paradigm? Considering methodological choices in health education systematic review. Medical Teacher, 38(7), 746–750. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2016.1147536
Gruszka, A., & Orzechowski, J. (2016). Meta-analysis of the research impact of Baddeley’s multicomponent working memory model and Cowan’s embedded-processes model of working memory: A bibliometric mapping approach. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/ppb-2016-0001
Guldenmund, F. W. (2000). The use of questionnaires in safety culture research – an evaluation. Safety Science, 45(6), 723–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.006
Hofmann, D. A., Burke, M. J., & Zohar, D. (2017). 100 years of occupational safety research: From basic protections and work analysis to a multilevel view of workplace safety and risk. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 375- 388. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000114
Hong, J. U., Kim, J. H., Lee, K. H., Lee, M., Hyun, I. Y., Cho, S. G., Kim, Y. J., Lee, H. Y., & Kim, G. R. (2019). Characteristics, trend, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in nuclear medicine. Medicine, 98(21), e15785. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000015785
Hudson, P. (2007). Implementing a safety culture in a major multi-national. Safety Science, 45(6), 697–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.005
Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.170
Hutchinson, D., Luria, G., Pindek, S., & Spector, P. (2021). The effects of industry risk level on safety training outcomes: A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Safety Science, 105594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105594
Jiang, J., Zhang, J., Li, R., Zhao, Z., & Ye, X. (2021). Research Trends of Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis on Acupuncture Therapy: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Pain Research, Volume 14, 561-573. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s290516
Lee, J., Huang, Y., Cheung, J. H., Chen, Z., & Shaw, W. S. (2019). A systematic review of the safety climate intervention literature: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(1), 66-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000113
Li, K., Li, A., Mei, Y., Zhao, J., Zhou, Q., Li, Y., Yang, M., & Xu, Q. (2023). Trace elements and Alzheimer dementia in population-based studies: A bibliometric and meta-analysis. Environmental Pollution, 318, 120782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120782
Liang, Y.-E., Ho, S. Y.-C., Chien, T.-W., & Chou, W. (2023). Analyzing the number of articles with network meta-analyses using chord diagrams and temporal heatmaps over the past 10 years: Bibliometric analysis. Medicine, 102(25), e34063. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034063
Litwiller, B., Snyder, L. A., Taylor, W. D., & Steele, L. M. (2017). The relationship between sleep and work: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(4), 682–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000169
Ma, C., Su, H., & Li, H. (2021). Global Research Trends on Prostate Diseases and Erectile Dysfunction: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study. Frontiers in Oncology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.627891
Maggio, L.A., Costello, J.A., Norton, C., Driessen, E., Artino, A. (2021). Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis. Perspect Med Educ 10, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00626-9
Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021484
Neal, A., Griffin, M. A. (2004). Safety climate and safety behavior. In J. Barling and M. R. (Eds.) The psychology of workplace safety (pp. 15-34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi:10.1037/10662-002
Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
Newaz, M. T., Davis, P. R., Jefferies, M., & Pillay, M. (2018). Developing a safety climate factor model in construction research and practice. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(6), 738–757. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-02-2017-0038
Noorani, T., Lin, Leong, J., Chong, W., MikoChong Kha Chee, Lee, C., & Maqbool, M. (2022). Evolving trend of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in endodontics: A bibliometric study. Saudi Endodontic Journal, 12(3), 236–236. https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_209_21
Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Khalil, H., Larsen, P., Marnie, C., Pollock, D., Tricco, A. C., & Munn, Z. (2022). Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evidence Synthesis, Publish Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-21-00242
Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge University Press.
Ricci, F., Chiesi, A., Bisio, C., Panari, C., & Pelosi, A. (2016). Effectiveness of occupational health and safety training. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(6), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-11-2015-0087
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., & Lewin, S. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850
Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. https://10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Verbeek, J., & Ivanov, I. (2013). Essential Occupational Safety and Health Interventions for Low- and Middle-income Countries: An Overview of the Evidence. Safety and Health at Work, 4(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.004
Weaver, S. J., Lubomksi, L. H., Wilson, R. F., Pfoh, E. R., Martinez, K. A., & Dy, S. M. (2016). Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(5_Part_2), 369. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00002
Wei, K., Cheng, L., Zheng, Q., Tian, J., Liu, R., & Hackert, T. (2023). Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for total pancreatectomy: a bibliometric review and meta-analysis. HPB: the Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, S1365-182X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.012
Weng, L.-M., Zheng, Y.-L., Peng, M.-S., Chang, T.-T., Wu, B., & Wang, X.-Q. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research. Pain Research and Management, 2020, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5396734
Wirth, O., & Sigurdsson, S. O. (2008). When workplace safety depends on behavior change: Topics for behavioral safety research. Journal of Safety Research, 39(6), 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2008.10.005
Xia, N., Griffin, M. A., Xie, Q., & Hu, X. (2023). Antecedents of workplace safety behavior: Meta-analysis in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12492
Zavareze, T. & Cruz, R.M. (2010). Instrumentos de medida de clima de segurança no trabalho: uma revisão de literatura. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 62(2), 65-77. Recuperado em 04 de outubro de 2023, de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-52672010000200007&lng=pt&tlng=pt
Zeinoun, P., Akl, E. A., Maalouf, F. T., & Meho, L. I. (2020). The Arab Region’s Contribution to Global Mental Health Research (2009–2018): A Bibliometric Analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00182
Zhang, B., Ao, B., Lu, X., Yang, S., Bao, P., Wang, H., Li, R., & Huang, Y. (2022). Global research trends on precision oncology: A systematic review, bibliometrics, and visualized study. Medicine, 101(43), e31380. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000031380
Zhang, Y., Huang, J., & Du, L. (2017). The top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research. Medicine, 96(6), e4822. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000004822
Zhao, L., Yang, D., Liu, S., & Nkrumah, E. N. K. (2022). The Effect of Safety Leadership on Safety Participation of Employee: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827694
Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
Zohar, D. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 1517-1522. https://doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Jorge Jose Ramirez-Landaeta, Gileade Jesimom Braga Santos, Roberto Moraes Cruz
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados pela Revista Trabalho EnCena permanecem propriedade dos autores, que cedem o direito de primeira publicação à revista. Os autores devem reconhecer a revista em publicações posteriores do manuscrito. O conteúdo da Revista Trabalho EnCena está sob a Licença Creative Commons de publicação em Acesso Aberto. É de responsabilidade dos autores não ter a duplicação de publicação ou tradução de artigo já publicado em outro periódico ou como capítulo de livro. A Revista Trabalho EnCena não aceita submissões que estejam tramitando em outra Revista. A Revista Trabalho EnCena exige contribuições significativas na concepção e/ou desenvolvimento da pesquisa e/ou redação do manuscrito e obrigatoriamente na revisão e aprovação da versão final. Independente da contribuição, todos os autores são igualmente responsáveis pelo artigo.
