Composted sewage sludge and different irrigation layers on Acacia polyphylla development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20873/jbb.uft.cemaf.v9n2.lanzetiKeywords:
biosolids, native species, seedling production, nurseriesAbstract
The selection of organic components to substrates in forest nurseries is increasingly common, with the aim of enhancing biological, chemical and physical data. The main components are the sewage process that goes through a stabilization process, becoming a rich component in industry that can be used in agriculture, and becomes a rich component in the composition of substrates. The objective of this work is to analyze the behavior of the species in different substrate compositions and irrigation depths. Five distinct formulations of composite substrate and commercial substrate (SC) and composted sludge and sewage (LEC) were used. The slide and irrigation evaluation was divided into three different irrigations, a total of 300 samples were analyzed. The parameters used were: plant height, stem diameter, leaf number, dry mass and root dry mass. Based on the results, the best alternatives for producing seedlings of wine in nurseries are observed, consisting of the following formulations: S1 (100% LEC), S2 (25% SC + 75% LEC), and S3 (50% SC + 50% LEC). The combination of 100% LEC resulted in the best development of seedlings, expressing a contribution with the increase in stem diameter, plant height, greater initial growth and root development, that is, in addition to the potential as fertilizer, it acts as a conditioner for physical assignments, chemical and biological necessary for seedlings. However, the different irrigation depths do not minimize the influences in any of the upper stages.
References
Abreu AHM, Leles PSS, Melo LA, Ferreira DHAA, Montei-ro FAS. Produção de mudas e crescimento inicial em campo de Enterolobium contortisiliquum produzidas em diferentes recipientes. Revista Floresta, v. 45, n. 1, p. 141-150, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rf
Araújo-Neto JC, Aguiar IB, Ferreira VM, Rodrigues TJD. Armazenamento e requerimento fotoblástico de sementes de Acacia polyphylla DC. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, v. 27, n. 1, p. 115-124, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222005000100014
Araújo-Neto JC, Aguiar IB, Ferreira VM, Paula RC. Caracte-rização morfológica de frutos e sementes e desenvolvimento pós-seminal de monjoleiro (Acacia polyphylla DC.). Revista Brasileira de Sementes, v. 24, n. 1, p. 203-211, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222002000100029
Cabreira GV, Leles PSS, Alonso JM, Abreu AHM, Lopes NF, Santos GR. Biossólido como componente de substrato para produção de mudas florestais. Revista Floresta, v. 47, n. 2, p. 165-176, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v47i1.44291
Camargo R, Maldonado ACD, Dias PAS, Souza MF, França MS. Diagnose foliar em mudas de pinhão-manso (Jatropha Curcas L.) produzidas com biossólido. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, v. 17, n. 3, p. 283-290, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000300006
Campoe OC, Lanelli C, Stape JL, Cook RL, Mendes JCT, Vivian R. Atlantic forest tree species responses to silvicul-tural practices in a degraded pasture restoration plantation: From leaf physiology to survival and initial growth. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 313, p. 233-242, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.016
Chaer GM, Resende AS, Campello EFC, Faria SM, Boddey RM. Nitrogen-fixing legume tree species for the reclamation of severely degraded lands in Brazil. Tree Physiology, v. 31, n. 2, p. 139–149, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq116
Chu L, He W. Toxic metals in soil due to the land application of sewage sludge in China: Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors. Science of The Total Environment, 143813, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143813
Delarmelina WM, Caldeira MVW, Faria JCT, Gonçalves EO. Uso de lodo de esgoto e resíduos orgânicos no crescimento de mudas de Sesbania virgata. Revista Agro@mbiente On-line, v. 7, n. 2, p. 184-192, 2013. https://doi.org/10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v7i2.888
Delarmelina WM, Caldeira MVW, Faria JCT, Gonçalves EO, Rocha RLF. Diferentes Substratos para a Produção de Mu-das de Sesbania virgata. Floram - Floresta e Ambiente, v. 21, n. 2, p. 224-223, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4322/floram.2014.027.
Gomes JM, Paiva HN. Viveiros florestais: propagação sexua-da. Editora UFV, v.1, n.1, p.116, 2013.
Gomes JM, Couto L, Leite HG, Xavier A, Garcia SLR. Cres-cimento de mudas de Eucalyptus grandis em diferentes ta-manhos de tubetes e fertilização N-P-K. Revista Árvore, v.27, n.2, p. 113-127, 2003.
Gomes JM, Couto L, Leite HG, Xavier A, Garcia SLR. Parâ-metros morfológicos na avaliação da qualidade de mudas de Eucalyptus grandis. Revista Árvore, Viçosa, v.26, n.6, p. 655-664, 2002.
Lobo FL, Oliveira FC, Morgado BT, Siqueira MVBM. Dife-rentes Misturas de Substratos com Lodo de Esgoto Com-postado Enriquecido e Substrato Comercial em Quaresmei-ra. Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Sci-ence, v.7, n.1, p. 326-340, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2018v7i1.p326-340
Lobo TF, Olher I, Siqueira MVBM, Oliveira FC. Commercial Substrate and sewage sludge composted use in angico ver-melho. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and En-vironmental Science, v.10, n. 1, p. 325-338, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2021v10i1.p325-338 2021
Melo L, Abreu A, Leles P, Oliveira R, Silva D. Qualidade e crescimento inicial de mudas de Mimosa caesalpiniifo-lia Benth. produzidas em diferentes volumes de recipien-tes. Ciência Florestal, v.28, n.1, p. 47-55, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509831574
Moreira SF, Santos SDO, Sardinha AS, Junior AP. O lodo de ETE como alternativa para a recuperação do solo em áreas degradadas / ETE sludge as an alternative to soil recovery in degraded areas. Brazilian Applied Science Review, v. 3, n.3, p. 1564-1585, 2019. https://doi.org/10.34115/basrv3n3-006
Morgado BT, Olher I, Timo TPC, Rossi MN, Lobo TF, Si-queira MVBM. Growth of Cecropia hololeuca in water blades and substrates formulated whit sewage sludge. Ama-zonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, v. 63, p. 1-10, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.22491/rca.2020.3174
Neves APN, Ferreira DS, Castro DA, Cavallini GS. Avalia-ção da eficiência de remoção de matéria orgânica em efluente sanitário em função da idade do lodo de reator UASB: um estudo de caso. Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversi-ty, v.7, n.4, p. 449-456, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20873/jbb.uft.cemaf.v7n4.neves
Olher I, Siqueira MVBM, Costa GHG, Lobo TF. Crescimento de mudas de pau viola (Cytharexyllum myrianthum) são po-tencializadas utilizando resíduos do tratamento de esgoto doméstico. Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, v.8, n.4, p. 304-310. 2020. https://doi.org/10.20873/jbb.uft.cemaf.v8n4.olher
Padilha NS, Silva CJ, Pereira SB, Silva JAN, Heid DM, Bottega SP, Scalon SPQ. Crescimento inicial do pinhão-manso submetido a diferentes regimes hídricos em latossolo vermelho distrófico. Ciência Florestal, v. 26, n. 2, p. 513-521, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509822752
Rudek A, Garcia AO, Peres FSB. Avaliação da qualidade de mudas de eucalipto pela mensuração da área foliar com o uso de imagens digitais. Enciclopédia Biosfera, Centro Cien-tífico Conhecer, v.9, n.17, p. 3775, 2013.
Santana LO, Araújo FM, Souza FLP, Leme MC, Timo TPC, Lobo TF, Siqueira MVBM. Desenvolvimento de mudas de dedaleiro (Lafoensia pacari A.St.-Hil.) mediante diferentes substratos e lâminas de irrigação. Revista Instituto Florestal, v. 31, n.2, p.147-156, 2019.
Scheer MB, Carneiro C, Santos KG. Substratos à base de lodo de esgoto compostado na produção de mudas de Parapipta-denia rigida (Benth.) Brenan. Scientia Forestalis, v. 38, n. 88, p. 637-644, 2010.
Scheer MB, Carneiro C, Bressan OA, Santos KG. Compostos de lodo de esgoto para a produção de mudas de Anadenan-thera colubrina (Vell.) Brenan. Cerne, v. 18, n. 4, p. 613-621, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-77602012000400011
Sousa AN, Almeida DM, Braga RSS, Barbosa Júnior VC, Santana JAS, Canto JL do. Produção de mudas de Moringa oleífera em diferentes concentrações de lodo de esgoto. Di-versitas Journal, v.5, n.3, p. 1504-1522. 2020. https://doi.org/10.17648/diversitas-journal-v5i3-958.
Teodoro PE, Ribeiro LP, Oliveira EP de, Corrêa CCG, Torres FE. Acúmulo de Massa Seca na Soja em Resposta a Aplica-ção Foliar com Silício sob Condições de Déficit Hídrico. Bioscience Journal, v. 31, n. 1, p. 161-170, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v31n1a2015-22283
Testezlaf R. Irrigação: métodos, sistemas e aplicações. Campi-nas: FEAGRI- Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola, UNI-CAMP, 203p. 2011.
Trazzi PA, Caldeira MVW, Colombi R, Gonçalves EO. Qua-lidade de mudas de Murraya paniculata produzidas em dife-rentes substratos. Revista Floresta, v. 42, n. 3, p. 621-630, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rf.v42i3.19718
Trigueiro RDM, Guerrini IA. Utilização de lodo de esgoto na produção de mudas de Aroeira-pimenteira. Revista Árvore, v. 38, n. 4, p. 657-665, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622014000400009
Vieira CR, Weber OLS. Produção de mudas de eucalipto em diferentes composições de substratos. REA – Revista de Es-tudos Ambientais, v.18, n. 2, p.25-34, 2016. https://doi.org/0.7867/1983-1501.2016v18n2p25-34
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 - Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0 at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Available at The Effect of Open Access, at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
