Subjetividade verde: ficção e identidade em The overstory

Authors

  • Anderson Soares Gomes Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro

Keywords:

identidade, natureza, ficção, Antropoceno

Abstract

This article aims to investigate how the novel The overstory (2018), by Richard Powers, challenges the traditional literary construction in configuring in its narrative a sense of identity to non-human beings – in the specific case of the work, trees. The novel consists of nine characters in different narratives, which intertwined, having in common the central presence of at least one tree in which story and presenting the complex relation between the aforementioned characters and those vegetal beings. The present work will be organized considering two focal points, in relation to the novel: first, the blurring of the division between the concepts of nature and culture, underpinned by contemporary environmental studies; and secondly, the relation between a developmentalist economic discourse and the environmental collapse, especially under the new geological epoch known as the Anthropocene. Thus, this article intends to show that The overstory tests the limits of the idea that only humans are the makers of meaning, highlighting that non-human beings can also be seen as possessors of identity.

References

BONNEUIL, C & FRESSOZ, J. The shock of the Anthropocene. London: Verso, 2016.
CHAKRABARTY, D. “O clima da história: quatro teses”. In: Sopro, n.91, p.4-22, 2013.
CHAKRABARTY, D. “The Anthropocene and the convergence of histories”. In: HAMILTON, et al. The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis. New York: Routledge, 2015.
CRUTZEN, P. “Geology of mankind”. In: Nature, n.415, p.23, 2002.
CRUTZEN, P & STOERMER, E. “The Anthropocene”. In: IGBP newsletter, n. 41, p.17-18, 2000.
DE GRAAUW, T & FIORE, E. “Green/Environmental humanities”. In: BRAIDOTTI, R & HLAVAJOVA, M. Posthuman glossary. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.
FRESSOZ, J. “Losing the Earth knowingly”. In: HAMILTON, et al. The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis. New York: Routledge, 2015.
GHOSH, A. The great derangement. London: Penguin, 2016.
HAMILTON, C. et al. “Thinking the Anthropocene”. In: HAMILTON, et al. The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis. New York: Routledge, 2015.
HERE’S to unsuicide: an interview with Richard Powers. Los Angeles Review of Books. 07 de abril, 2018. Disponível em: <https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/heres-to-unsuicide-an-interview-with-richard-powers/>. Acesso em: 05 de ago. de 2020.
IOVINO, S. “Literature of liberation”. In: BRAIDOTTI, R & HLAVAJOVA, M. Posthuman glossary. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.
KRENAK, A. Ideias para adiar o fim do mundo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2019.
LATOUR, B. Facing Gaia. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.
LATOUR, B. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
MARQUES, L. Capitalismo e colapso ambiental. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, 2018.
MOORE, J. Capitalism in the web of life. London: Verso, 2015.
POWERS, R. The overstory. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2018.
THUNBERG, G. “2019: London – Greta Thunberg wants her future back”. In: Lapham’s quarterly, vol. XII, n.4, p.71-74, 2019.
TORRES, S. “O antropoceno e antropo-cena pós-humana: narrativas de catástrofe e contaminação”. In: Ilha do desterro, v.70, n.2, p.93-105. 2017.
TREXLER, A. & JOHNS-PUTRA, A. “Climate change in literature and literary criticism”. In: Wiley interdisciplinary reviews climate change, v.2, p.185-200. 2011.
WOHLLEBEN, P. The hidden life of trees. Vancouver: Greystone Books, 2016.
YUSSOF, K. A billion black Anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 2018.
ZIZEK, S. Living in the end times. London: Verso, 2010.

Published

2020-10-28

How to Cite

Gomes, A. S. (2020). Subjetividade verde: ficção e identidade em The overstory. Porto Das Letras, 6(4), 146–167. Retrieved from https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/portodasletras/article/view/10369

Issue

Section

Literaturas em Língua Inglesa: diversidades essenciais