Hobbes and the Nomos of “original distribution”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20873.rpv9n2-21Keywords:
Hobbes, Sovereignty, Private Property, Political ModernityAbstract
The article takes as its starting point the Foucauldian interpretation that Hobbes proposes to remove the “discourse of war” from the historical genesis of sovereignty and replace it with a “juridical-contractualist” foundation. By reabsorbing “sovereignty by acquisition” into “sovereignty by institution,” Hobbes (according to Foucault) polemicize with both parties that faced each other in the English Civil War, the monarchical and the parliamentary. What remains overshadowed in this interpretation is the major stake in the conflict, namely the status of private property and the right to levy taxes. By bringing this dimension back to light, the article demonstrates the deep modernity of Hobbes’s position, based on a conception of the political institution of property in the Nomos of an “original distribution,” as distinct from both the feudal-patrimonial conception of property based on the “right of conquest” and the liberal conception of property as a “natural right” (and therefore pre-political).
References
ARENDT, H. 2004: Le origini del totalitarismo. Milano: Einaudi.
ASBACH, O. 2018: Hobbes und die Ambivalenzen des modernen Steuerstaats. In: Huhnholz, S. (ed.): Fiskus – Verfassung – Freiheit. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
ASTON, T. (ed.) 1965: Crisis in Europe 1560-1660. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
BOBBIO, N. 1965: Da Hobbes a Marx. Saggi di storia della filosofia. Napoli: Morano.
BRENNER, R. 1993: Merchants and Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FERRIER, S.G. 2020: Subjects of History: Foucault and the emergence of conflictual nationhood and biopolitics. In: Le foucauldien 6:1.
FOUCAULT, M. 2005: Sicurezza, territorio, popolazione. Corso al Collège de France (1977-1978) Milano: Feltrinelli.
FOUCAULT, M. 2009: Bisogna difendere la società. Corso al Collège de France (1975-1976). Milano: Feltrinelli.
FOUCAULT, M. 2016: La società punitiva. Corso al Collège de France (1972-1973). Milano: Feltrinelli.
FOUCAULT, M. 2019: Teorie e istituzioni penali. Corso al Collège de France (1971-1972). Milano: Feltrinelli.
HILL, C. 1997: Puritanism and Revolution. New York: St. Martin.
HOBBES, T. 1948: Sul cittadino. Torino: UTET.
HOBBES, T. 1979: Behemoth. Bari: Laterza
HOBBES, T. 2011: Leviatano. Milano: BUR.
HOBSBAWM, E. J. 1954a: The General Crisis of the European Economy in the 17th Century. In: Past & Present 5:1.
HOBSBAWM, E. J. 1954b: The Crisis of the 17th Century – II. In: Past & Present 6:1.
LAZZARATO, M. 2022: Guerra o rivoluzione. Roma: DeriveApprodi.
MACEY, D. 2008: Some reflections on Foucault’s Society Must Be Defended. In: Morton,
S. / Bygrave, S. (ed.): Foucault in an Age of Terror. New York: Palgrave.
MACPHERSON C.B. 1982: Libertà e proprietà alle origini del pensiero borghese. La teoria dell'individualismo possessivo da Hobbes a Locke. Milano: Mondadori.
McWHORTER, L. 2011: Decapitating Power. In: Foucault Studies 12.
O’BRIEN, P. 2011: The nature and historical evolution of an exceptional fiscal state and its possible significance for the precocious commercialization and industrialization of the British economy from Cromwell to Nelson. In: Economic History Review 64:2.
PARKER, G. / SMITH, L.M. (ed.) 1978: The General Crisis of the 17th Century. London:
Taylor & Francis.
PIAZZI, A. 1977: Stato e proprietà nella teoria politica di Thomas Hobbes. In: Tronti, M. (ed.): Stato e rivoluzione in Inghilterra. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
SCHMITT, C. 1972: Appropriazione / divisione / produzione. Un tentativo di fissare correttamente i fondamenti di ogni ordinamento economico-sociale, a partire dal “nomos”. In: Schmitt: Le categorie del “politico”. Bologna: Il Mulino.
TRONTI, M. 1977a: Hobbes e Cromwell. In: Tronti (ed.): Stato e rivoluzione in Inghilterra. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
TRONTI, M. 1977b: Le due transizioni. In: Tronti: L’autonomia del politico. Milano: Feltrinelli.
VON REDECKER, E. 2021: Autoritäre Akkumulation. Hannah Arendt über Hobbes’ Leviathan und bürgerliche Geschichte. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 69:6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gregorio Demarchi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Magazine is under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0), according to which:
1) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution which allows the sharing of articles published with the recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for distribution of the version of the work published in this journal, as long as there is recognition of authorship and initial publication in Perspectivas.
3) Authors are authorized and encouraged to disseminate published texts with proper references to the journal and its authors.