Galileo’s law of free fall and modern science
historical and philosophical views
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20873/rpv8n1-66Abstract
The clearly recognized innovation in Galileo’s work on free fall has been a stimulus and a challenge for the history and philosophy of science. This article will analyze the experimental and theoretical aspects of Galileo’s work on free fall. It draws on several authors’ results to justify the claim that the research model established by Galileo remains valid today (Sections 2 and 3). The article draws this parallel with current science by focusing on Galileo’s method, way of considering scientific instruments, and practice of confrontation between theory and experiments. The Galilean mode of investigation can be interpreted from a variety of possible philosophical perspectives: Section 3 examines how relevant the so-called constructivist and conventionalist perspectives are to analysis of Galileo’s innovations. Section 4 discusses Galileo’s contribution to the mathematization of science and the Platonic character of his thought. Finally, the article attempts to show that Galileo’s Platonism also involves experiments, as he conceives them.
Keywords: Inclined Plane. Mathematics. Platonism
References
Bachelard, G., (1967), La Formation de l'esprit scientifique : Contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance
objective, Paris : J. VRIN, (1st ed. 1934).
Chareix, F., (2007), Weight and powers: Galileo's statics read by Ernst Mach, Europe. Revue littéraire mensuelle, Europe. Revue, 2007, p.229- 250. ⟨halshs-00422711⟩ (Accessed 10 April 2022).
Dahan-Dalmedico, A. & Peiffer, J. (1986) Une histoire des mathématiques, Routes et dédales. Paris: Seuil,
PERSPECTIVAS | VOL. 8, Nº 1, 2023, P. 246-262
Galileo’s law of free fall and modern science: historical and philosophical views
DOI: 10.20873/rpv8n1-66
DeCaro, M. (2017), On Galileo’s Platonism, Again in R. Pisano, J. Agassi and D. Drozdova (eds.), Hypotheses
and Perspectives within History and Philosophy of Science. Homage to Alexandre Koyré 1964–2014,
Springer 2017, pp. 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61712-1_5 (Accessed 2 Mai, 2022).
Drake, S. (1974), Mathematics and discovery in Galileo's physics, Historia Mathematica Volume 1, Issue 2,
, p. 129-150, May, 1974, https://doi.org/10.1016/0315-0860(74)90002-0.p (Accessed 13 February, 2022).
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., Mortimer, E. (1994), Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom, Educational Researcher, 23,7, 5-12, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005 (Accessed, 12 April, 2022).
Franklin, A. and Slobodan, P. (2021), Experiment in Physics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/physics-experiment/>. (Accessed, 21 April 2022).
Friedman, M., Ernst Cassirer, (2022), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), Edward
N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/cassirer/ (Accessed 6
Mai, 2022).
Galilei, G. (1953) Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Translator: Drake, S., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1953, ISBN 0-520-00449-3.
Hacking, I. (1999), The social construction of what? Cambridge (Massachusetts) London (England): Harvard
University Press, 1999.
Heilbron, J., (1979), Electricity in the 17th & 18th Centuries. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979.
Heinzmann, G. and Stump (2021), D., Henri Poincaré, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021
Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/poincare/>. (Accessed 28 April 2022).
Holton, G. (1962), Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science, 6th ed. London: Addison-Wesley,
Koyré, A. (1939), Études Galiléennes, Paris: Hermann, 1939.
Koyré, A. (1943), Galileo and Plato, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Oct., 1943), pp. 400-428 (29
pages), University of Pennsylvania Press, https://doi.org/10.2307/2707166, (Accessed 24 April
.
Mach, E. (1902), The Science of Mechanics, A Critical and Historical Account of its Development, trans. Thomas
McCormack, Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Company, 3rd ed. 1902.
Machamer, P. & Miller, D. (2021), "Galileo Galilei", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021
Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/galileo/>. (Accessed 12 April, 2022).
Matteoli,G., (2019), Galileo, Plato and the Scientific Revolution: The Origins of Galileo’s Platonism Thesis in
the Historiography of Science, Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science
(7): 70-84, ISSN 2526-2270, www.historiographyofscience.org, Belo Horizonte – MG / Brazil.,
(Accessed 14 May, 2022)
Palmieri, P. (2003), Mental models in Galileo’s early mathematization of nature, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 34 (2003)
–264, www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsa (Accessed, 14 May 2022).
PERSPECTIVAS | VOL. 8, Nº 1, 2023, P. 246-262
Galileo’s law of free fall and modern science: historical and philosophical views
DOI: 10.20873/rpv8n1-66
Panza, M. (2002), Mathematization of the Science of Motion and the Birth of Analytical Mechanics: A Historiographical Note.in P. Cerrai, P. Freguglia, C. Pellegrini. The Application of Mathematics to the Sciences
of Nature. Critical moments and Aspects. Kluwer A. P., Plenum P., New York, pp.253-271, 2002.
(Accessed 4, May, 2022).
Poincaré, H., (1902), La Science et l’Hypothèse, Paris : Flammarion, 1902.
Poincaré, H. (1982), The Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, The Value of Science, Science and
Method, translations of Poincaré 1902, 1905b & 1908, University Press of America, 1982.
Radder, H. (2009), The philosophy of scientific experimentation: a review. Autom Exp 1, 2 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-4499-1-2. (Accessed 16 April 2022).
Riegler A. (2012) Constructivism. In: L‘Abate, L. (ed.) Paradigms in Theory Construction, New York: Springer,
–256.
Roux, S. and Festa, E. (2008), The Enigma of the Inclined Plane from Hero to Galileo in Mechanics and Natural
Philosophy before the Scientific Revolution, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.195-221,
, halshs-00806464. (Accessed 2 Mars, 2022).
Sady, W. (2021), Ludwik Fleck, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N.
Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/fleck/>. (Accessed 11
April 2022).
Simonyi, K. (2012) A Cultural History of Physics, New York: A K Peters/CRC Press, 2012 ISBN 9781568813295.
Torretti, R. (1999), The Philosophy of Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Isabel Serra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Magazine is under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0), according to which:
1) The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution which allows the sharing of articles published with the recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for distribution of the version of the work published in this journal, as long as there is recognition of authorship and initial publication in Perspectivas.
3) Authors are authorized and encouraged to disseminate published texts with proper references to the journal and its authors.
