El tándem Alemania-Francia y la expansión europea hacia el este
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20873/rpv8n3-87Palavras-chave:
Expansão, liderança, Mercosul, União EuropeiaResumo
Diversos autores plantean la centralidad analítica del tándem europeo Alemania-Francia (también referido como ‘eje francoalemán’) durante el desarrollo de las negociaciones, en contraposición a un tándem Brasil-Argentina por el lado del Mercosur. El objetivo de este trabajo es problematizar la dinámica de funcionamiento del mencionado tándem en el contexto de expansión de la Unión Europea hacia el este a comienzos del nuevo milenio. Entendemos que las tensiones, alineamientos y realineamientos nacionales durante aquel proceso, al igual que otros sucesos de relevancia que escapan a los objetivos de este trabajo, nos ofrecen material necesario para desplegar y analizar la dinámica de liderazgo europeo entre el tándem mencionado y otros actores relevantes, como el Reino Unido y los órganos institucionales de la Unión.
Referências
ÁGH, A. “The increasing core-periphery divide and new member states. Diverging from the European Union’s mainstream developments”, en J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, Routledge, pp. 117-129, 2016.
BULMER, S., y PATERSON, W. E. “Germany as the EU’s reluctant hegemon? Of economic strenght and political constraints”, Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1387-1405, 2013.
BULMER-THOMAS, V. “The European Union and MERCOSUR: Prospects for a Free Trade Agreement”, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42(1), 1-22, 2000.
DIMITROV, V. “The Central and East European Countries: From Weak Latecomers to Good Citizens of the Union”, en J. Hayward & R. Wurzel (Eds.), European Disunion. Between Sovereignty and Solidarity, Palgrave Macmillan , pp. 298-313, 2012.
DOCTOR, M. “Why Bother With Inter-Regionalism? Negotiations for a European Union-Mercosur Agreement”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 281-314, 2007.
FAUST, J. The European Union’s Trade Policy towards MERCOSUR, Working Paper PEIF-7, 2002.
GALGÓCZI, B. “The southern and eastern peripheries in Europe. Is convergence a lost cause?”, en J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, Routledge, pp. 130-145, 2016.
GARCÍA, M. “The European Union and Latin America: «Transformative power Europe» versus the realities of economic interests”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, iFirst, 1-20, 2012.
GRÄBNER, C., HEIMBERGER, P., KAPELLER, J., y SCHÜTZ, B. “Is the Eurozone disintegrating? Macroeconomic divergence, structural polarisation, trade and fragility”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44, 647-669, 2020.
GUÉROT, U., y KLAU, T. “After Merkozy: How France and Germany can make Europe work”, European Council on Foreign Relations, 56, 1-16, 2012.
HAYWARD, J. “National Governments, the European Council and Councils of Ministers: A Plurality of Sovereignties. Member State Sovereigns without an EU Sovereign”, en J. Hayward & R. Wurzel (Eds.), European Disunion. Between Sovereignty and Solidarity, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65-81, 2012.
KIRCHNER, E. J. “Germany and the European Union: From Junior to Senior Role”, en G. Smith, W. E. Paterson, & S. Padgett (Eds.), Developments in German Politics 2, Macmillan, 1996.
KONOLD, D. “Farm Interests ar Bargaining Chips: France in the EU-Mercosur Free Trade Negotiations”, Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 321-343, 2010.
LEHNE, S. The Big Three in EU Foreign Policy. Carnegie Europe, 2012.
MAGONE, J. M., LAFFAN, B., y SCHWEIGER, C. “The European Union as a dualist political economy. Understanding core-periphery relations”, en J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, Routledge, 2016.
MAKUC, A., DUHALDE, G., y ROZEMBERG, R. La Negociación MERCOSUR-Unión Europea a Veinte Años del Acuerdo Marco de Cooperación: Quo Vadis?, Nota técnica Nro. IDB-TN-841, BID-INTAL, 2015.
MEUNIER, S., y NICOLAÏDIS, K. “The European Union as a conflicted trade power”, Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 906-925, 2006.
MORISSE-SCHILBACH, M. “«Ach Deutschland!» Greece, the Euro Crisis, and the Costs and Benefits of Being a Benign Hegemon”, Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 1, 26-41, 2011.
NAURIN, D., y LINDAHL, R. “East-North-South: Coalition-Building in the Council before and after Enlargement”, en D. Naurin & H. Wallace (Eds.), Unveiling the Council of the European Union. Games Governments play in BrusselsK, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 64-78, 2008.
PARADERO HUERTA, I. “Sociopolitical divisions in the European Union. Discourses of southern European representatives in the European institutions”, en J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, Routledge, pp. 99-116, 2016.
PASQUALI, M. L. The Impact of Eastern Enlargement on the European Union’s Foreign Policy towards Latin America and the Caribbean (2004-2016), Study Paper N.o 03/16, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, 2016.
PATERSON, W. E. “Does Germany Still Have a European Vocation?”, German Politics, 19(1), 41-52, 2010.
PATERSON, W. E. “The Reluctant Hegemon? Germany Moves Centre Stage in the European Union”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49, 57-75, 2011.
SANCHEZ BAJO, C. “The European Union and Mercosur: A case of inter-regionalism”, Third World Quarterly, 20(5), 927-941, 1999.
SANDBECK, S., y SCHNEIDER, E. “From the Sovereign Debt Crisis to Authoritarian Statism: Contradictions of the European State Project”, New Political Economy, 19(6), 847-871, 2014.
SANTANDER, S. “The European Partnership with Mercosur: A Relationship Based on Strategic and Neo-liberal Principles”, European Integration, 27(3), 285-306, 2005.
SCHNEIDER, E., y SANDBECK, S. “Monetary integration in the Eurozone and the rise of transnational authoritarian statism”, Competition & Change, 0(0), 1-27, 2018.
SCHNEIDER, E., y SYROVATKA, F. “Die Europäische Wirtschaftsunion zwischen Vertiefung und Desintegration. Blockade und wachsende Asymmetrie zwischen Deutschland und Frankreich”, en H.-J. Bieling & S. Guntrum (Eds.), Neue Segel, alter Kurs? Die Eurokrise und ihre Folgen für das europäische Wirtschaftsregieren, Springer VS, pp. 21-59, 2019.
SCHWEIGER, C. “National interests and differentiated integration in the EU under crisis conditions. The cases of Germany, France and Britain”, en J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, Routledge, pp. 59-71, 2016.
SEPOS, A. “The centre-periphery divide in the Eurocrisis. A theoretical approach”, en J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and conflict in a dualist political economy, Routledge, pp. 35-55, 2016.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Alejandro Marcelo Jaquenod
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os autores que publicam com esta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
1. Autores mantêm os direitos concedidos à revista ou o direito de primeira publicação com o trabalho licenciado à Atribuição de Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento de trabalhos com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inical nesta revista.
2. Autores têm permissão para aceitar contratos, distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (por exemplo, publicarem em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro) com reconhecimento de autoria e de publicação inicial nesta revista.
3. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir o seu trabalho on-line (por exemplo, em repositório institucional ou em sua página pessoal) com as devidas referências à revista.
