Morphophysiological and developmental parameters of maize varieties

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20873/jbb.uft.cemaf.v10n3.neves

Palabras clave:

Zea mays L., plant development, plant physiology, plant morphology, genetic improvement

Resumen

Knowing the characteristics of maize varieties becomes a strategy for an adequate crop planning, in order to extract the maximum agronomic power of each variety. The objective of this work is to know the morphophysiological and developmental parameters of maize varieties. The experiment was conducted in August 2021, in Faculdades Integradas Stella Maris (FISMA), located in the Municipality of Andradina, State of São Paulo. The design was entirely randomized, where six maize varieties were grown: XB 8010; AG 1051; Cateto Paraguay; Sweet Maize (Paraguay Soup); White Maize and Asteca Mole and with four repetitions, totaling 20 plots or pots. The hybrid varieties showed better development characteristics. The criolla variety Asteca Mole presented lower developmental characteristics. Stomatal density and functionality were expressed in an antagonistic way. Maize varieties did not present differences in internal morphology in the leaves. Correlations were found between the morphophysiological and developmental parameters in the maize varieties.

Citas

Afolabi MS, Murtadha MA, Lamidi WA, Waheed JA, Salami AE, Bello OB. Evaluation of yield and yield com-ponents of low n maize (Zea mays L.) varieties under low and high nitrogen conditions. African Journal of Agricul-tural Research, v.15, n.1, p.66-72, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11875

Aono AH, Nagai JS, Dickel GDS, Marinho RC, Oliveira PE, PE, Papa JP, Faria, FA. A stomata classification and detection system in microscope images of maize cultivars. Plos One, v.16, n.10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258679

Banzatto DA; Kronka SN. Experimentação Agrícola. 4.ed. Funep, 237p. 2013.

Bongard-Pierce DK; Evans MMS, Poethig RS. Heteroblastic features of leaf anatomy in maize and their genetic regula-tion. International Journal of Plant Sciences, v.157, n.4, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1086/297353

Carlquist S. Ecological strategies of xylem evolution. Berke-ley: University of California. 259p. 1975.

Pereira FJ, Paiva R, Castro EM. Histologia vegetal: estrutura e função de órgãos vegetativos. Lavras, Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2009.

Chang FH, Troughton JH. Chlorophyll a/b ratios in C3 and C4 plants. Photosynthetica. v.6, 1972. p.57-65.

Chen Z, Sun J, Li D, Li P, He K, Ali F, Mi G, Chen F, Yuan L, Pan Q. Plasticity of root anatomy during domestication of a maize-teosinte derived population. Journal of Experimental Botany, v.73, n.1, p.139-153, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab406

Chiango H, Figueiredo A, Sousa L, Sinclair T, Silva JM. Assessing drought tolerance of traditional maize genotypes of Mozambique using chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. South African Journal of Botany, v.138, p.311-317, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.01.005

Chukwudi UP, Kutu FR, Mavengahama S. Influence of Heat Stress, Variations in Soil Type, and Soil Amendment on the Growth of Three Drought–Tolerant Maize Varieties. Agro-nomy, v.11, n.8, p.1-28, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081485

Ebertz PJ, Mergener RA, Pereira T, Mantovani A, Sponchiado JC, Rauber LP. Aumento do diâmetro do colmo de milho em função de doses de nitrogênio. In: Seminário de Inicia-ção Científica e Seminário Integrado de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão. 2019.

Embrapa - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 3.ed. Brasília, 353 p. 2013.

Gaj R, Szul P, Siatkowski I, Waligóra H. Assessment of the Effect of the Mineral Fertilization System on the Nutritional Status of Maize Plants and Grain Yield Prediction. Agricul-ture, v.10, n.9, p.1-14, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10090404

Galarreta JIR, Alvarez A. Morphological classification of maize landraces from northern Spain. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, v.48, p.391-400, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012074606561

Hassan N, Hasan K, Shaddam O, Islam MS, Barutçular C, Sabagh AEL. Responses of maize varieties to salt stress in relation to germination and seedling growth. International Letters of Natural Sciences, v.69, p.1-11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.69.1

Klein JL, Viana AFP, Martini PM, Adams S.M, Guzatto C, Bona RA, Rodrigues LS, Alves Filho DC, Brondani IL. Desempenho produtivo de híbridos de milho para a produ-ção de silagem da planta inteira. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, v.17, n.1, p.101-110, 2018. https://doi.org/10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v17n1p101-110

Kraus JE, Arduim M. Manual básico de métodos em morfolo-gia vegetal. Seropédica: EDUR, 221p. 1997.

Liu W, Liu G, Yang Y, Guo X, Ming B, Xie R, Liu Y, Wang K, Hou P, Li S. Spatial variation of maize height morpho-logical traits for the same cultivars at a large agroecological scale. European Journal of Agronomy, v.130, p.1-10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126349

Manjunatha C, Gogoi R, Singh B, Jeevan B, Rai SN, Singh PK. Phenotypic and physiological characterization of maize inbred lines resistant and susceptible to maydis leaf blight. Indian Phytopathology, v.72, p.217-224, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-019-00117-w

Mccubbina TJ, Braun DM. Phloem anatomy and function as shaped by the cell wall. Journal of Plant Physiology, v.266, p.1-10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153526

Parry C, Blonquist Jr JM, Bugbee B. Medição in situ da con-centração de clorofila foliar: análise da relação ópti-ca/absoluta. Plant, Cell and Environment. v.37, p.2508-2520, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12324

Team, R. (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA.

Van Raij B, Cantarella H, Quaggio JA Furlani AMC. Reco-mendações de adubação e calagem para o Estado de São Paulo. Campinas, IAC. 285p. (1996). (Boletim técnico, 100).

Ramazan S, Bhat HA, Zargar MA, Ahmad P, John R. Com-bined gas exchange characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence and response curves as selection traits for temperature toler-ance in maize genotypes. Photosynthesis Research, v.150, p.213-225, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00829-z

Shrestha RK, Lei P, Shi D, Hashimi MH, Wang S, Xi D, Ni J, Ni C. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) towards vapor pressure deficit. Environmental and Experimental Botany, v.1981, p.1-9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104293

Silva DF, Garcia PHM, Santos GCL, Farias IMSC, Pádua GVG, Pereira PHB, Silva FE, Batista RF, Gonzaga Neto S, Cabral AMD. Morphological characteristics, genetic im-provement and planting density of sorghum and corn crops: a review. Research, Society and Development, v.10, n.3, 2021. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13172

Vazquez, GH, Arf O, Sargi BA, Pessoa ACO. Influência do tamanho e da forma da semente de milho sobre o desenvol-vimento da planta e a produtividade de grãos. Bioscience Journal, v.28, n.1, p.16-24, 2012.

Somekh B. Taking the sociological imagination to school: Na anlysis of information and communiation Technologies on education systems. Technology pedagogy and Education, v.13, n.2, p.163-179, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390400200178

Souza SSDS, Carvalho AMR, Aragon GT. Ensino Superior a Distância: o alcance da oferta no Rio de Janeiro. Revista acadêmica MAGISTRO, v.2, n.16, 2017.

Tonini A. Percepção discente sobre a Licenciatura em Matemá-tica na modalidade a distância. REVEMAT: Revista Eletrô-nica de matemática, v.8, n.2, p.162-176, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1981-1322.2013v8n2p162

Zhang Y, Zhao G, Zhou B. Does learning longer imporove student achievement? Evidence from on line education of graduating students in a high school during Covid-19 peri-od. China Economic Review, v.70, p.1-20, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101691

Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity (CeMAF / UFT)

Descargas

Publicado

2022-10-01

Cómo citar

Neves, G. F. de O., Brito, B. S. de, Januário, T. V. V., Santos Junior, E. D. dos, & Aparecido Manzani Lisboa, L. (2022). Morphophysiological and developmental parameters of maize varieties. Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, 10(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.20873/jbb.uft.cemaf.v10n3.neves